
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅149.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌344.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $465 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 342.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅149.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $465 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 342.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌344.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS and RTX A400


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 6,012 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2100 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,012 | 5,983 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+218% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2100 MHz+19% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS draws 100W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1 | 119.7+99% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 77.5% less ($465 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 343% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $135-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 44.3+343% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GA107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #135 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














