
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅97.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅97.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,012 |
| Architecture | GCN | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2100 MHz+133% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 512-bit (Dual) vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s (Dual) | System |
| Bus Width | 512-bit (Dual) | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.0 | 60.1+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS costs 25% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 33.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $600-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 10.0+33% |
| Codename | Neptune CF | Navi 23 |
| Release | March 1 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #348 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













