
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅78.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅78.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H better than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 16 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,809 | 4,852 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3840+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.437 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+564% |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 2105 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 64.1+230% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 24.3 |
| Codename | Vega 12 | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 14 2018 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #451 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












