
Quadro M2000M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M2000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 132W, a 77W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 132W vs 55W.
Quadro M2000M
2015Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 132W, a 77W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 132W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H better than Quadro M2000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M2000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000M and Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M
The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H reaches 3,448 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Boost clocks: 1098 MHz vs 2491 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,410 | 3,448+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1792+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS+535% |
| Boost Clock | 1098 MHz | 2491 MHz+127% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H has 2 GB. The Quadro M2000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H's 132W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-58% | 132W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0+138% | 26.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M2000M | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | GM107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | December 3 2015 | October 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #550 | #150 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













