
Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX Vega 64 better than RTX A2000 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A2000 12GB make more sense than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 64 and RTX A2000 12GB

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,949+2% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+23% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS+59% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz+29% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+146% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3.3 MB+230% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+1500% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 123.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 70W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 196.0+314% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The RTX A2000 12GB costs 10% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 9.3% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $449-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 30.6+9% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA106 |
| Release | August 7 2017 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #171 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













