
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌781.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅9.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 777.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Draws 295W instead of 475W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅9.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,900 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 777.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Draws 295W instead of 475W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌781.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon RX Vega 64

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo scores 14,018 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,018 | 13,949 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2 | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2+11% | 12.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz+11% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 78.5% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 384-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+79% | 484 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 2048-bit+433% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 8+100% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: UVD 7.2 (2x) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 (2x) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 (2x) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo draws 475W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 46.8% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 295W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5 | 47.3+60% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 88.7% less ($3900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 775% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4399 | $499-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 28.0+775% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #170 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













