G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌313% higher power demand at 475W vs 115W.

RTX A4000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 475W, a 360W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

2019

RTX A4000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 475W, a 360W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌313% higher power demand at 475W vs 115W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4000 Mobile better than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?

Yes. RTX A4000 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX A4000 Mobile averages 27.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,782 vs 14,018 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX A4000 Mobile is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4000 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4000 Mobile is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTX A4000 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $4,399 MSRP, and you are getting 27.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega II Duo really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 14,018 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Benchmark Check

RTX A4000 Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	114 FPS	132 FPS
medium	104 FPS	114 FPS
high	88 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	101 FPS	106 FPS
medium	86 FPS	88 FPS
high	73 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	47 FPS
medium	47 FPS	41 FPS
high	38 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	25 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	381 FPS	351 FPS
medium	326 FPS	303 FPS
high	258 FPS	252 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	246 FPS	251 FPS
medium	212 FPS	210 FPS
high	176 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	127 FPS
medium	96 FPS	108 FPS
high	79 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	71 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	538 FPS	665 FPS
medium	459 FPS	532 FPS
high	389 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	315 FPS	333 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	499 FPS
medium	350 FPS	399 FPS
high	298 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	249 FPS
4K
low	261 FPS	333 FPS
medium	216 FPS	266 FPS
high	174 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	166 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	386 FPS	292 FPS
medium	317 FPS	255 FPS
high	270 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	292 FPS	223 FPS
medium	245 FPS	201 FPS
high	200 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	132 FPS
medium	153 FPS	113 FPS
high	132 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	71 FPS

Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and RTX A4000 Mobile

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.

RTX A4000 Mobile

The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo scores 14,018 versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 14,782 — the RTX A4000 Mobile leads by 5.5%. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	14,018	14,782+5%
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4096 ×2	5120+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.09 TFLOPS ×2	17.2 TFLOPS+22%
Boost Clock	1720 MHz+2%	1680 MHz
ROPs	64 ×2	80+25%
TMUs	256 ×2+60%	160
L1 Cache	1 MB	5 MB+400%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX A4000 Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	8+100%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.2 (2x) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
Encoder	VCE 4.1 (2x)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD 7.2 (2x)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo draws 475W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 122% difference. The RTX A4000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
TDP	475W	115W-76%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	120mm	0mm
Slots	4	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	29.5	128.5+336%