
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than Radeon RX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 780 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon RX 780

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon RX 780's 7,658 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 63.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 60 (Radeon RX 780) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+64% | 7,658 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+294% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2335 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 60+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 780 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-28% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+127% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 228.8% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+229% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #211 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













