
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,050 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2413.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2429.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,050 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2413.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2429.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID RTX6000-1Q better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GRID RTX6000-1Q

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the GRID RTX6000-1Q reaches 12,617 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 12,617 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+89% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+51% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+72% | 56.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 96% less ($6050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 2415% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+2415% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM204 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #211 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













