
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 128), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅60% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (128 vs 80).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅60% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (128 vs 80).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 128), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A3000 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and RTX A3000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1230 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 32 (RTX A3000 Mobile) with 80 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 12,720+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 10.08 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+44% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A3000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the RTX A3000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 60% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-18% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 181.7+88% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | GA104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #211 | #205 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













