
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+21.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌75.4% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,654 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅+21.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌75.4% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,654 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 7400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 7400

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 7400's 11,654 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 21.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+21% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+156% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2300 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+280% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+7% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+163% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 115.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 43W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 271.0+207% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 43% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 45% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $199-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 58.6+45% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













