
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than Radeon RX 6850M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6850M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon RX 6850M

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 6850M
Radeon RX 6850M
The Radeon RX 6850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,274 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 and the Radeon RX 6850M reaches 12,274 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6850M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6850M). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6850M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+2% | 12,274 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+5% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2416 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6850M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6850M) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6850M's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon RX 6850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6850M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 102.3+6% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













