
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌3.5% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌3.5% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 867 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB reaches 20,096 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 20,096+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+14% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2581 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — a 41.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 384 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+111% | 80.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 3.3% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 69.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 6.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $289-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 69.5+6% |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #75 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












