G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 135W instead of 250W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌85.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 135W.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 135W instead of 250W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌85.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 135W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700M better than Titan X Pascal?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 6700M averages 3.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 13,525 vs 13,660 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6700M is a 2021 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Titan X Pascal is a 2016 model from an older flagship class with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016, more VRAM at 10 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6700M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and you are getting 3.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (13,525 vs 13,660). Titan X Pascal really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Titan X Pascal still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Titan X Pascal is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 13,660 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6700M Benchmark Check

Titan X Pascal Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	164 FPS	146 FPS
medium	146 FPS	130 FPS
high	127 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	138 FPS	126 FPS
medium	112 FPS	103 FPS
high	98 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	73 FPS
medium	70 FPS	62 FPS
high	55 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	41 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open Titan X Pascal

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	392 FPS	339 FPS
medium	329 FPS	296 FPS
high	269 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	255 FPS	215 FPS
medium	213 FPS	187 FPS
high	177 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	104 FPS
medium	103 FPS	88 FPS
high	83 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	57 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open Titan X Pascal

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	609 FPS	615 FPS
medium	487 FPS	492 FPS
high	406 FPS	410 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	456 FPS	461 FPS
medium	365 FPS	369 FPS
high	304 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	307 FPS
medium	243 FPS	246 FPS
high	203 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	154 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open Titan X Pascal

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	609 FPS	519 FPS
medium	487 FPS	449 FPS
high	406 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	456 FPS	422 FPS
medium	365 FPS	367 FPS
high	304 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	291 FPS	259 FPS
medium	243 FPS	246 FPS
high	203 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	154 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open Titan X Pascal

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700M and Titan X Pascal

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score	13,525	13,660
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3584+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.06 TFLOPS	10.97 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+57%	1531 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	144	224+56%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	1.3 MB+160%
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Titan X Pascal lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6700M comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 50% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity	10 GB+25%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	320 GB/s	480 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	160-bit	384-bit+140%
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
Encoder	VCN 3.0	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	VCN 3.0	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 59.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	Titan X Pascal
TDP	135W-46%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	Mobile	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	100.2+84%	54.6