G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅28.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
❌92.9% higher power demand at 135W vs 70W.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 135W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅28.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 135W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
❌92.9% higher power demand at 135W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700M better than RTX A2000?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 28.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 10 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 10 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and you are getting 28.0% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. RTX A2000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6700M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, RTX A2000 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is RTX A2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX A2000 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $450 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6700M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6700M Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
1080p
low	164 FPS	108 FPS
medium	146 FPS	92 FPS
high	127 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	138 FPS	92 FPS
medium	112 FPS	78 FPS
high	98 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	38 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	38 FPS
medium	70 FPS	35 FPS
high	55 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	18 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open RTX A2000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
1080p
low	392 FPS	164 FPS
medium	329 FPS	132 FPS
high	269 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	255 FPS	118 FPS
medium	213 FPS	95 FPS
high	177 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	60 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	70 FPS
medium	103 FPS	55 FPS
high	83 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	34 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open RTX A2000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
1080p
low	609 FPS	606 FPS
medium	487 FPS	485 FPS
high	406 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	456 FPS	428 FPS
medium	365 FPS	361 FPS
high	304 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	227 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	303 FPS
medium	243 FPS	242 FPS
high	203 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	147 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open RTX A2000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
1080p
low	609 FPS	245 FPS
medium	487 FPS	212 FPS
high	406 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	456 FPS	187 FPS
medium	365 FPS	166 FPS
high	304 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	291 FPS	106 FPS
medium	243 FPS	88 FPS
high	203 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	56 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700M Open RTX A2000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700M and RTX A2000

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
G3D Mark Score	13,525	13,464
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	3328+44%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.06 TFLOPS+38%	7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+100%	1200 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	144+38%	104
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	3.3 MB+560%
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36+38%	26

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A2000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6700M comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
VRAM Capacity	10 GB+25%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	160-bit+25%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	6+500%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
Encoder	VCN 3.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 63.4% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700M	RTX A2000
TDP	135W	70W-48%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	68mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	100.2	192.3+92%