G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $732 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Delivers 185% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌25% higher power demand at 175W vs 140W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000

2021

Why buy it

✅14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
✅Draws 140W instead of 175W, a 35W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
193.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,111 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6700

2021

RTX A4000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $732 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Delivers 185% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
✅Draws 140W instead of 175W, a 35W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌25% higher power demand at 175W vs 140W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
193.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,111 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4000 better than Radeon RX 6700?

Yes. RTX A4000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 10 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4000 is about 193.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,111 MSRP versus $379 MSRP, and you are getting 14.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A4000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon RX 6700 make more sense than RTX A4000?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $379 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A4000. The trade-off is that RTX A4000 currently gives you 2.9% higher G3D Mark and 14.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 6700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6700 Benchmark Check

RTX A4000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
1080p
low	168 FPS	166 FPS
medium	150 FPS	148 FPS
high	132 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	146 FPS
medium	113 FPS	124 FPS
high	101 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	70 FPS
medium	73 FPS	60 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	38 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX A4000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
1080p
low	432 FPS	261 FPS
medium	357 FPS	219 FPS
high	286 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	271 FPS	187 FPS
medium	223 FPS	150 FPS
high	185 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	95 FPS
medium	107 FPS	78 FPS
high	87 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	53 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX A4000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
1080p
low	844 FPS	873 FPS
medium	681 FPS	701 FPS
high	568 FPS	584 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	438 FPS
1440p
low	639 FPS	657 FPS
medium	511 FPS	526 FPS
high	426 FPS	438 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	328 FPS
4K
low	426 FPS	438 FPS
medium	341 FPS	350 FPS
high	284 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	219 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX A4000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
1080p
low	679 FPS	282 FPS
medium	564 FPS	246 FPS
high	474 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	217 FPS
medium	440 FPS	193 FPS
high	358 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	132 FPS
medium	277 FPS	113 FPS
high	250 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	73 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX A4000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700 and RTX A4000

Radeon RX 6700

The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.

RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6700 scores 18,920 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700) vs 48 (RTX A4000) vs 192.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
G3D Mark Score	18,920	19,463+3%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	6144+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.29 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock	2450 MHz+57%	1560 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	144	192+33%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%
Ray Tracing Cores	36	48+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6700 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 40% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
VRAM Capacity	10 GB	16 GB+60%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	320 GB/s	448 GB/s+40%
Bus Width	160-bit	192-bit+20%
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
Encoder	VCE	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6700 draws 175W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 6700) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX A4000
TDP	175W	140W-20%
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	108.1	139.0+29%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The Radeon RX 6700 costs 65.9% less ($732 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the Radeon RX 6700 offers 185.1% better value.