G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6700

2021

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Why buy it

✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than Radeon RX 6700?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU averages 7.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 18,920 vs 19,656 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (100W vs 175W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $379 MSRP. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $379 MSRP, and you are getting 7.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6700 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 6700 make more sense than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $379 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. The trade-off is that RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU currently gives you 3.9% higher G3D Mark and 7.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 6700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6700 Benchmark Check

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	168 FPS	143 FPS
medium	150 FPS	124 FPS
high	132 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	77 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	114 FPS
medium	113 FPS	95 FPS
high	101 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	51 FPS
medium	73 FPS	44 FPS
high	59 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	28 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	432 FPS	379 FPS
medium	357 FPS	327 FPS
high	286 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	230 FPS
1440p
low	271 FPS	282 FPS
medium	223 FPS	236 FPS
high	185 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	132 FPS
medium	107 FPS	113 FPS
high	87 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	72 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	844 FPS	826 FPS
medium	681 FPS	680 FPS
high	568 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	639 FPS	628 FPS
medium	511 FPS	510 FPS
high	426 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	332 FPS
4K
low	426 FPS	406 FPS
medium	341 FPS	324 FPS
high	284 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	212 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	679 FPS	301 FPS
medium	564 FPS	260 FPS
high	474 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	239 FPS
medium	440 FPS	211 FPS
high	358 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	142 FPS
medium	277 FPS	121 FPS
high	250 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	79 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6700 Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon RX 6700

The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6700 scores 18,920 and the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 19,656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 160.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	18,920	19,656+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	5120+122%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.29 TFLOPS	15.82 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock	2450 MHz+59%	1545 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	160+11%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	5 MB+900%
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores	36	40+11%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6700 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 35% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	10 GB	12 GB+20%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	320 GB/s	432 GB/s+35%
Bus Width	160-bit	192-bit+20%
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6700) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	Radeon RX 6700	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	VCE	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	UVD	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6700 draws 175W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 54.5% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 6700) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.