
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+28.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+28.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 6650M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6650M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6650M

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 15,171 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 28.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+29% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+75% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+2% | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 21.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+21% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-4% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+34% | 126.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #84 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












