
Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 172mm vs 156mm.
T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 172mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌151.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6500
T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 172mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 172mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌151.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is T1000 8GB better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500 and T1000 8GB

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.

T1000 8GB
T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500 scores 7,610 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,610 | 7,674 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6500) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500 draws 75W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 40% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 6500) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 172mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 172mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 153.5+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199 MSRP, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 60.2% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) vs 15.3 (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 149.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-60% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+150% | 15.3 |
| Codename | — | TU117 |
| Release | sem dados | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #335 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












