
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅77.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.5% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅77.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.5% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 7100 better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Radeon RX 6500

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,701+1% | 7,610 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 172mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 172mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.2 | 101.5+71% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 75.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 297.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 38.2+298% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | — |
| Release | November 10 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #331 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












