
Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 326.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P4: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P4 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.
- ❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580
2017Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 326.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P4: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P4 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.
- ❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P4 better than Radeon RX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 580 make more sense than Tesla P4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 580 and Tesla P4

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 580 scores 8,799 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 580) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1340 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,799 | 9,004+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.175 TFLOPS+8% | 5.704 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1340 MHz+20% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 960 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla P4 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 580 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 580) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 580 draws 185W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 84.6% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 580) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 75W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.6 | 120.1+152% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 580 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The Radeon RX 580 costs 77.1% less ($771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 326.7% better value. The Radeon RX 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-77% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4+327% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #301 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













