
Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700M
2020RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A3000 Mobile better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5700M make more sense than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and RTX A3000 Mobile

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1230 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,669 | 12,720 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.926 TFLOPS | 10.08 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz+40% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A3000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A3000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4 | 181.7+158% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













