Radeon RX 5700M vs RTX A3000 Mobile

AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

2020Core: 1465 MHzBoost: 1720 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1230 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 5700M

2020

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • 3.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A3000 Mobile better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. RTX A3000 Mobile averages 3.3% more FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,669 vs 12,720 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RTX A3000 Mobile is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (70W vs 180W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX A3000 Mobile can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. RTX A3000 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX A3000 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.3% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 5700M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon RX 5700M make more sense than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Yes. Radeon RX 5700M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A3000 Mobile. The trade-off is that RTX A3000 Mobile currently gives you 0.4% higher G3D Mark and 3.3% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low154 FPS110 FPS
medium140 FPS93 FPS
high122 FPS78 FPS
ultra105 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS94 FPS
medium109 FPS79 FPS
high93 FPS59 FPS
ultra84 FPS39 FPS
4K
low77 FPS39 FPS
medium66 FPS35 FPS
high53 FPS22 FPS
ultra47 FPS18 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low262 FPS188 FPS
medium220 FPS149 FPS
high154 FPS118 FPS
ultra112 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low159 FPS129 FPS
medium133 FPS104 FPS
high100 FPS85 FPS
ultra75 FPS67 FPS
4K
low87 FPS70 FPS
medium73 FPS56 FPS
high58 FPS47 FPS
ultra42 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low570 FPS572 FPS
medium456 FPS458 FPS
high380 FPS382 FPS
ultra285 FPS286 FPS
1440p
low428 FPS429 FPS
medium342 FPS343 FPS
high285 FPS286 FPS
ultra214 FPS215 FPS
4K
low285 FPS286 FPS
medium228 FPS229 FPS
high190 FPS191 FPS
ultra143 FPS143 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low432 FPS276 FPS
medium361 FPS241 FPS
high301 FPS196 FPS
ultra259 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS213 FPS
medium303 FPS190 FPS
high239 FPS155 FPS
ultra199 FPS128 FPS
4K
low194 FPS129 FPS
medium155 FPS110 FPS
high140 FPS88 FPS
ultra116 FPS70 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and RTX A3000 Mobile

AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1230 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
12,669
12,720
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
7 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2304
4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.926 TFLOPS
10.08 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock
1720 MHz+40%
1230 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+13%
128
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A3000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A3000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
Encoder
VCN 2.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 2.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
TDP
180W
70W-61%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
70.4
181.7+158%