G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅7.3% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 5700M

2020

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Radeon RX 5700M

2020

Why buy it

✅7.3% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon RX 5700M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design averages 7.3% more FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,675 vs 12,669 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, plus much lower power draw (80W vs 180W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025), and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 7.3% more estimated average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 5700M is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 5700M make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. Radeon RX 5700M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design currently gives you 0.0% higher G3D Mark and 7.3% more estimated average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	163 FPS	154 FPS
medium	145 FPS	140 FPS
high	121 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	131 FPS
medium	122 FPS	109 FPS
high	88 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	77 FPS
medium	59 FPS	66 FPS
high	41 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	47 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon RX 5700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	193 FPS	262 FPS
medium	158 FPS	220 FPS
high	133 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	159 FPS
medium	114 FPS	133 FPS
high	101 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	87 FPS
medium	64 FPS	73 FPS
high	56 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	42 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon RX 5700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	570 FPS	570 FPS
medium	456 FPS	456 FPS
high	380 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	285 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	428 FPS
medium	342 FPS	342 FPS
high	285 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	214 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	285 FPS
medium	228 FPS	228 FPS
high	190 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	143 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon RX 5700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	247 FPS	432 FPS
medium	214 FPS	361 FPS
high	173 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	360 FPS
medium	167 FPS	303 FPS
high	132 FPS	239 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	194 FPS
medium	94 FPS	155 FPS
high	76 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	116 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon RX 5700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon RX 5700M

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

Radeon RX 5700M

The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,675 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
G3D Mark Score	12,675	12,669
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3072+33%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.294 TFLOPS+5%	7.926 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1720 MHz+27%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	192+33%	144
L2 Cache	4 MB	8 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	8 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 5700M
TDP	80W-56%	180W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	158.4+125%	70.4