
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID RTX6000-1Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon RX 5700M

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1720 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GRID RTX6000-1Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 70.4+25% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













