
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+11.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+11.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5700M make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 11.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+11% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1720 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 384 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+25% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













