
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅36.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅36.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 OEM better than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 9100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 12,250 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,250 | 12,333 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+92% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 draws 230W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 150W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.3 | 82.2+54% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | July 10 2017 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #219 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













