
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅16.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅16.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 9100 better than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 410 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro WX 9100

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,144 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU scores 12,144 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,144 | 12,250 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-43% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.4+75% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2199 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #211 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













