
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 410 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,144 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU scores 12,144 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,144 | 12,442+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+19% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+19% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 93.4 | 95.7+2% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #211 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













