
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 241mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌44.3% longer card at 241mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 241mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌44.3% longer card at 241mm vs 167mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 OEM better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than Radeon RX 5600 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208 | 12,333+1% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS+67% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B50 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+112% | 82.2 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #221 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













