Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 483% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
  • Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • 53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 473.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • 125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
  • 59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Intel Arc Pro B50 better than Radeon PRO V710?
Yes. Intel Arc Pro B50 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 1.7% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2025 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2024 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Intel Arc Pro B50 is about $1,651 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 483%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon PRO V710 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,000 MSRP, even if Intel Arc Pro B50 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low64 FPS174 FPS
medium45 FPS155 FPS
high36 FPS136 FPS
ultra26 FPS115 FPS
1440p
low51 FPS144 FPS
medium29 FPS117 FPS
high19 FPS102 FPS
ultra15 FPS93 FPS
4K
low33 FPS90 FPS
medium20 FPS76 FPS
high14 FPS61 FPS
ultra10 FPS53 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low183 FPS508 FPS
medium135 FPS416 FPS
high91 FPS329 FPS
ultra62 FPS270 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS341 FPS
medium71 FPS277 FPS
high54 FPS230 FPS
ultra41 FPS191 FPS
4K
low45 FPS161 FPS
medium33 FPS135 FPS
high28 FPS115 FPS
ultra21 FPS91 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low549 FPS540 FPS
medium439 FPS432 FPS
high366 FPS360 FPS
ultra275 FPS270 FPS
1440p
low412 FPS405 FPS
medium330 FPS324 FPS
high275 FPS270 FPS
ultra206 FPS202 FPS
4K
low275 FPS270 FPS
medium220 FPS216 FPS
high183 FPS180 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low549 FPS540 FPS
medium439 FPS432 FPS
high366 FPS360 FPS
ultra275 FPS270 FPS
1440p
low412 FPS405 FPS
medium330 FPS324 FPS
high275 FPS270 FPS
ultra206 FPS202 FPS
4K
low275 FPS270 FPS
medium220 FPS216 FPS
high183 FPS180 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Radeon PRO V710

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score
12,208+2%
12,000
Architecture
Xe2
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2048
3456+69%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS
27.65 TFLOPS+160%
Boost Clock
2600 MHz+30%
2000 MHz
ROPs
16
96+500%
TMUs
128
216+69%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
16
54+238%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
Encoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Decoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 77.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
TDP
70W-56%
158W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
267mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
174.4+130%
75.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 82.5% less ($1651 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 483.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
MSRP
$349-83%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
35.0+483%
6.0
Codename
BMG-G21
Navi 32
Release
September 5 2025
October 3 2024
Ranking
#221
#196