
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 483% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌473.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 483% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌473.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro B50 better than Radeon PRO V710?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 91 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Radeon PRO V710

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208+2% | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3456+69% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+160% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+30% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 128 | 216+69% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 54+238% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 77.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+130% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 82.5% less ($1651 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 483.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-83% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+483% | 6.0 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 32 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #221 | #196 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













