
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 XT better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208 | 12,442+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS+39% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+73% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B50 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 60% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+82% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 40.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+41% | 24.9 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #221 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













