
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960
2015Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960 better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5500M make more sense than GeForce GTX 960?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133+3% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1408+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+92% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1645 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 960 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 85W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 70.0+14% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #393 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













