
Radeon R9 390
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌83.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon R9 390
2015Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌83.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 390 better than Radeon RX 5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5500 make more sense than Radeon R9 390?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 398 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390 and Radeon RX 5500

Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 390 scores 8,855 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 390) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,855 | 8,837 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.12 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1845 MHz+85% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 390 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 390 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 390 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 390. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 390 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 110W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 180mm |
| Height | 109mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5 | 80.3+172% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 390 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 45.6% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 83.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $179-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.9 | 49.4+84% |
| Codename | Grenada | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #296 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













