
Radeon R9 390
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390
2015Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 390X better than Radeon R9 390?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 390 make more sense than Radeon R9 390X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 398 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390 and Radeon R9 390X

Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 390 scores 8,855 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 390) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,855 | 9,278+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.12 TFLOPS | 5.914 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 176+10% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 704 KB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 512-bit vs 512-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 384 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 512-bit | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 390 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 8.7% difference. The Radeon R9 390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 275W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 277mm |
| Height | 109mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5 | 33.7+14% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 390 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The Radeon R9 390 costs 23.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 24.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-23% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.9+25% | 21.6 |
| Codename | Grenada | Grenada |
| Release | June 18 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #296 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













