
Radeon R9 390
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390
2015Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600M better than Radeon R9 390?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 398 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 65 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390 and Radeon RX 5600M

Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 390 scores 8,855 and the Radeon RX 5600M reaches 8,857 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 390) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,855 | 8,857 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.12 TFLOPS | 5.829 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1265 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 390 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 390 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600M has 6 GB. The Radeon R9 390 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 390. Bus width: 512-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+11% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+167% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 390 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 0mm |
| Height | 109mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 90°C-5% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5 | 59.0+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 390 | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | Grenada | Navi 10 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #296 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













