
Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅50.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌365.1% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $471 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 369.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅50.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $471 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 369.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌365.1% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5300 better than Radeon Pro 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580X and Radeon RX 5300

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580X scores 7,540 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,540 | 7,606 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+19% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1645 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 580X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580X draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.3 | 76.1+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 78.5% less ($471 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 368.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $129-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 59.0+368% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 18 2019 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #339 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












