
Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌71.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌71.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is T1000 better than Radeon Pro 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 580X and T1000

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580X scores 7,540 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,540 | 7,649+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+121% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1395 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580X draws 150W versus the T1000's 50W — a 100% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.3 | 153.0+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The T1000 costs 41.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 73.8% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $350-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 21.9+74% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | March 18 2019 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #339 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












