
Radeon R9 290
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 290
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅16.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 290
2013Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅16.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 480 better than Radeon R9 290?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 290 make more sense than Radeon RX 480?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290 and Radeon RX 480

Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,184 | 8,546+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+11% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 290 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 290. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+25% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 240mm |
| Height | 109mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 85°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.8 | 57.0+91% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 290 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 82% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5 | 37.3+82% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Ellesmere |
| Release | November 5 2013 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #316 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












