Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon RX 480

AMD

Radeon R9 290

2013Core: 947 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 290

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 74.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Radeon RX 480

2016

Why buy it

  • 16.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 81.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 480 better than Radeon R9 290?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon RX 480 averages 16.6% more FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 8,184 vs 8,546 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 480 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 275W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 290 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 480 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 480 is about $170 cheaper on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 16.6% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 81.9%. Radeon R9 290 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon R9 290 make more sense than Radeon RX 480?
Yes. Radeon R9 290 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 480. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 480 currently gives you 4.4% higher G3D Mark and 16.6% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 81.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
1080p
low83 FPS104 FPS
medium71 FPS88 FPS
high59 FPS75 FPS
ultra39 FPS50 FPS
1440p
low72 FPS90 FPS
medium64 FPS75 FPS
high47 FPS57 FPS
ultra30 FPS37 FPS
4K
low26 FPS36 FPS
medium25 FPS32 FPS
high17 FPS21 FPS
ultra14 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
1080p
low185 FPS149 FPS
medium156 FPS129 FPS
high129 FPS111 FPS
ultra100 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS89 FPS
medium103 FPS71 FPS
high83 FPS56 FPS
ultra64 FPS43 FPS
4K
low60 FPS37 FPS
medium49 FPS30 FPS
high44 FPS24 FPS
ultra36 FPS19 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
1080p
low368 FPS385 FPS
medium295 FPS308 FPS
high246 FPS256 FPS
ultra184 FPS192 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS288 FPS
medium221 FPS231 FPS
high184 FPS192 FPS
ultra138 FPS144 FPS
4K
low184 FPS192 FPS
medium147 FPS154 FPS
high123 FPS128 FPS
ultra92 FPS96 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
1080p
low152 FPS247 FPS
medium123 FPS214 FPS
high105 FPS174 FPS
ultra87 FPS148 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS188 FPS
medium90 FPS165 FPS
high78 FPS129 FPS
ultra62 FPS107 FPS
4K
low64 FPS104 FPS
medium49 FPS84 FPS
high39 FPS66 FPS
ultra28 FPS53 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290 and Radeon RX 480

AMD

Radeon R9 290

The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 480

The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
G3D Mark Score
8,184
8,546+4%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560+11%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.849 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+11%
144
L1 Cache
640 KB+11%
576 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 290 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 290. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s+25%
256 GB/s
Bus Width
512-bit+100%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
TDP
275W
150W-45%
Recommended PSU
750W
500W-33%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
8-pin
Length
275mm
240mm
Height
109mm
95mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
85°C-11%
Perf/Watt
29.8
57.0+91%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 290 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 82% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon RX 480
MSRP
$399
$229-43%
Performance per Dollar
20.5
37.3+82%
Codename
Hawaii
Ellesmere
Release
November 5 2013
June 29 2016
Ranking
#316
#305