
Radeon R9 290
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 290
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290X / 390X across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅0.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290
2013Radeon R9 290X / 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅0.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290X / 390X across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 290X / 390X better than Radeon R9 290?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 290 make more sense than Radeon R9 290X / 390X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290 and Radeon R9 290X / 390X

Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Radeon R9 290X / 390X
The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon R9 290X / 390X reaches 8,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,184 | 8,380+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS | 5.914 TFLOPS+22% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 176+10% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 704 KB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 512-bit vs 512-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 275mm |
| Height | 109mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.8 | 30.5+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 290 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290 costs 27.3% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Radeon R9 290 offers 34% better value. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X / 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+34% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Hawaii | Grenada |
| Release | November 5 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #316 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












