
Radeon R9 290
Popular choices:

Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 290
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌130.6% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 290: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 290 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon R9 290
2013Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 290: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 290 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌130.6% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX590 GME better than Radeon R9 290?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 94 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290 and Radeon RX590 GME

Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX590 GME
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,184 | 8,349+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+11% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 290 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME has 8 GB. The Radeon RX590 GME offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon RX590 GME is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 175W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 241mm |
| Height | 109mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.8 | 47.7+60% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 290 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. The Radeon RX590 GME costs 56.6% less ($226 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 135.6% better value. The Radeon RX590 GME is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $173-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5 | 48.3+136% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Polaris 30 |
| Release | November 5 2013 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #316 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












