
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+128.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 75.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 150W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅+128.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 75.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 150W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 480

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 480's 8,546 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 128.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+129% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+159% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+94% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+436% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 480 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 480 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 6.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+6% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-23% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+198% | 57.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 23.4% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 75.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $229-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+75% | 37.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #84 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












