Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

2020

Why buy it

  • 92.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 47.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H better than Radeon R9 M395?
Yes. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H averages 92.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 4,852 vs 4,934 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is a 2020 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon R9 M395 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is about $100 cheaper on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 92.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (4,852 vs 4,934). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon R9 M395 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon R9 M395 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $300 MSRP, even if Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low77 FPS130 FPS
medium63 FPS118 FPS
high49 FPS100 FPS
ultra32 FPS85 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS107 FPS
medium54 FPS91 FPS
high38 FPS76 FPS
ultra24 FPS67 FPS
4K
low24 FPS60 FPS
medium23 FPS54 FPS
high15 FPS44 FPS
ultra13 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low84 FPS218 FPS
medium58 FPS175 FPS
high42 FPS146 FPS
ultra27 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low48 FPS164 FPS
medium28 FPS131 FPS
high20 FPS109 FPS
ultra14 FPS82 FPS
4K
low16 FPS109 FPS
medium10 FPS87 FPS
high8 FPS73 FPS
ultra6 FPS55 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low222 FPS218 FPS
medium178 FPS175 FPS
high148 FPS146 FPS
ultra111 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low167 FPS164 FPS
medium133 FPS131 FPS
high111 FPS109 FPS
ultra83 FPS82 FPS
4K
low111 FPS109 FPS
medium89 FPS87 FPS
high74 FPS73 FPS
ultra56 FPS55 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low129 FPS218 FPS
medium105 FPS175 FPS
high90 FPS146 FPS
ultra73 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS164 FPS
medium80 FPS131 FPS
high69 FPS109 FPS
ultra55 FPS82 FPS
4K
low57 FPS109 FPS
medium44 FPS87 FPS
high35 FPS73 FPS
ultra26 FPS55 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M395 scores 4,934 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395 is built on GCN while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H).

FeatureRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
G3D Mark Score
4,934+2%
4,852
Architecture
GCN
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1792
3840+114%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M395 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
65.8+239%
19.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H offers 48.2% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 M395Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP
$300
$200-33%
Performance per Dollar
16.4
24.3+48%
Codename
Navi 21
Release
June 9 2015
October 28 2020
Ranking
#445
#65