
Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:

Tesla K8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Tesla K8
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Tesla K8
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M295X better than Tesla K8?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K8 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and Tesla K8

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Tesla K8
Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,150 | 5,111 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS+19% | 2.491 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla K8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 51.1+148% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 MSRP, while the Tesla K8 launched at $1000. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 70% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 5.1 (Tesla K8) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 237.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2+237% | 5.1 |
| Codename | Amethyst | GK104 |
| Release | November 23 2014 | September 16 2014 |
| Ranking | #437 | #515 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













