
Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M295X better than Radeon R9 M395X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M395X make more sense than Radeon R9 M295X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395X

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X scores 5,150 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,150 | 5,120 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 10% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s+10% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6 | 68.3+232% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 50% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 102.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M395X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2+102% | 8.5 |
| Codename | Amethyst | Amethyst |
| Release | November 23 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #437 | #438 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













