
Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌18.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌18.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 Fury make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury scores 9,521 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,521 | 9,741+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.168 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of HBM. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit | 4096-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 195mm |
| Height | 115mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.6 | 35.4+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. The Radeon R9 Fury costs 15.4% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury offers 15.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-15% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3+15% | 15.0 |
| Codename | Fiji | Fiji |
| Release | July 10 2015 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #274 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













