
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 275mm, a 34mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌21.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 275mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 275mm, a 34mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌21.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 275mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500 better than Radeon R9 390?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and Radeon R9 390

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Radeon R9 390 reaches 8,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 390). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913 | 8,855 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.12 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+40% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 390). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 390's 300W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 275mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-58% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3+142% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390 launched at $329. The Radeon R9 390 costs 17.5% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 20.6% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $329-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 26.9+21% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Grenada |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #294 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













