
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960 better than Radeon R9 380X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon R9 380X

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,131 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+21% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 5.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 960. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce GTX 960 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+6% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+150% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 13.1% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 14.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-13% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+15% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GM206 | Antigua |
| Release | January 22 2015 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #393 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













