G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
738.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
❌32.1% longer card at 292mm vs 221mm.

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 774.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 292mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

FirePro S7000

2012

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 774.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 292mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
738.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
❌32.1% longer card at 292mm vs 221mm.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 370 better than FirePro S7000?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,524 vs 4,722 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 370 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (110W vs 150W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S7000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 370 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $149 MSRP. Radeon R9 370 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 370 is about $1,100 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $1,249 MSRP, and you are getting 4.4% higher G3D Mark. FirePro S7000 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does FirePro S7000 make more sense than Radeon R9 370?

Yes. FirePro S7000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $1,249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 370. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 370 currently gives you 4.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 774.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S7000 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 370 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	103 FPS	78 FPS
medium	88 FPS	66 FPS
high	71 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	69 FPS
medium	77 FPS	59 FPS
high	56 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	24 FPS
medium	27 FPS	23 FPS
high	18 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	13 FPS

Open FirePro S7000 Open Radeon R9 370

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	134 FPS	111 FPS
medium	101 FPS	82 FPS
high	80 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	63 FPS
medium	52 FPS	42 FPS
high	38 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	23 FPS
medium	19 FPS	16 FPS
high	15 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	8 FPS

Open FirePro S7000 Open Radeon R9 370

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	204 FPS	212 FPS
medium	163 FPS	170 FPS
high	136 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	159 FPS
medium	122 FPS	127 FPS
high	102 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	106 FPS
medium	81 FPS	85 FPS
high	68 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	53 FPS

Open FirePro S7000 Open Radeon R9 370

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	181 FPS	136 FPS
medium	146 FPS	109 FPS
high	128 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	99 FPS
medium	104 FPS	82 FPS
high	92 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	59 FPS
medium	57 FPS	45 FPS
high	45 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	25 FPS

Open FirePro S7000 Open Radeon R9 370

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 370

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370).

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score	4,524	4,722+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	320 KB	384 KB+20%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro S7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 292mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon R9 370
TDP	150W	110W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	292mm	221mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	85	75-12%
Perf/Watt	30.2	42.9+42%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 370 costs 88.1% less ($1100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 780.6% better value. The Radeon R9 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).