Page Index

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 285

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

2014Core: 918 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
4 GB 50
6,574
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Radeon R9 285
4 GB 190
6,680
+1.6%
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon HD 7870 XT
brand logoRadeon R9 M295X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
brand logoRadeon RX 7700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 285: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • ❌280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 285 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,574 vs 6,680 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 285 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 285 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $249 MSRP. Radeon R9 285 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 285 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 190W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design make more sense than Radeon R9 285?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 190W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 285. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 285 currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
1080p
low80 FPS81 FPS
medium68 FPS69 FPS
high57 FPS57 FPS
ultra38 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS71 FPS
medium60 FPS62 FPS
high44 FPS45 FPS
ultra28 FPS29 FPS
4K
low25 FPS26 FPS
medium24 FPS24 FPS
high16 FPS16 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignOpen Radeon R9 285
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
1080p
low167 FPS129 FPS
medium142 FPS98 FPS
high110 FPS78 FPS
ultra80 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS73 FPS
medium99 FPS53 FPS
high80 FPS39 FPS
ultra59 FPS27 FPS
4K
low71 FPS27 FPS
medium59 FPS19 FPS
high47 FPS15 FPS
ultra33 FPS11 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignOpen Radeon R9 285
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
1080p
low290 FPS301 FPS
medium237 FPS240 FPS
high197 FPS200 FPS
ultra148 FPS150 FPS
1440p
low222 FPS225 FPS
medium177 FPS180 FPS
high148 FPS150 FPS
ultra111 FPS113 FPS
4K
low140 FPS150 FPS
medium118 FPS120 FPS
high84 FPS100 FPS
ultra53 FPS75 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignOpen Radeon R9 285
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
1080p
low147 FPS140 FPS
medium121 FPS113 FPS
high102 FPS97 FPS
ultra87 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS104 FPS
medium88 FPS85 FPS
high75 FPS74 FPS
ultra62 FPS57 FPS
4K
low62 FPS62 FPS
medium48 FPS47 FPS
high38 FPS37 FPS
ultra28 FPS26 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignOpen Radeon R9 285
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score
6,574
6,680+2%
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS
3.29 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
112+75%
L1 Cache
1 MB+127%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 285 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+9%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
TDP
50W-74%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
—
221mm
Height
—
109mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
131.5+274%
35.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon R9 285
MSRP
—
$249
Codename
TU117
Tonga
Release
April 2 2020
September 2 2014
Ranking
#371
#365