G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro W8100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro W8100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

FirePro W8100

2014

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro W8100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro W8100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W8100 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,812 vs 6,574 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W8100 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014 and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro W8100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,499 MSRP. FirePro W8100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro W8100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 220W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design make more sense than FirePro W8100?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 220W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro W8100. The trade-off is that FirePro W8100 currently gives you 3.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W8100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	139 FPS	80 FPS
medium	118 FPS	68 FPS
high	97 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	70 FPS
medium	98 FPS	60 FPS
high	74 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	25 FPS
medium	37 FPS	24 FPS
high	23 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	14 FPS

Open FirePro W8100 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	233 FPS	167 FPS
medium	198 FPS	142 FPS
high	149 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	169 FPS	122 FPS
medium	139 FPS	99 FPS
high	112 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	71 FPS
medium	78 FPS	59 FPS
high	65 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	33 FPS

Open FirePro W8100 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	307 FPS	290 FPS
medium	245 FPS	237 FPS
high	204 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	148 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	222 FPS
medium	184 FPS	177 FPS
high	153 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	111 FPS
4K
low	153 FPS	140 FPS
medium	123 FPS	118 FPS
high	102 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	53 FPS

Open FirePro W8100 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	277 FPS	147 FPS
medium	238 FPS	121 FPS
high	196 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	107 FPS
medium	178 FPS	88 FPS
high	140 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	62 FPS
medium	89 FPS	48 FPS
high	72 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	28 FPS

Open FirePro W8100 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 6,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design).

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,812+4%	6,574
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+150%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.219 TFLOPS+72%	2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+150%	64
L1 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W8100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design).

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder	VCE 2.0	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	UVD 4.2	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro W8100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP	220W	50W-77%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	87°C	75°C-14%
Perf/Watt	31.0	131.5+324%